The Trowel in Freemasonry: a Symbolic Tool or a Jacobite Sign?

Among the most familiar symbolic working tools of Freemasonry — the Square, the Compasses, the Level, and the Plumb Rule — some appear almost self-evident, so naturally do they belong to Masonic ritual. Yet one tool essential to the work of builders appears surprisingly rarely: the trowel. This discretion raises questions. Why, in Freemasonry, is the trowel almost absent from the earliest known rituals? How can we explain the relatively late appearance of the trowel in Freemasonry, which is only observed in a few eighteenth-century rituals? And above all, should the trowel in Freemasonry be understood simply as a symbolic working tool… or as the trace of a historical — perhaps even political — current now largely forgotten?

1. The Trowel in Freemasonry: an Almost Absent Tool in the Earliest Rituals

When we examine the earliest known documents of speculative Freemasonry, the place of the trowel appears strikingly marginal. The oldest surviving Masonic texts — mainly Scottish and English — date from the very end of the seventeenth century and the beginning of the eighteenth century. In these documents, the symbolic working tools mentioned are almost always the same: the Square, the Compasses, the Level, the Plumb Rule, the Mallet, or the Chisel. The trowel, however essential it was in the practical work of builders, appears in only one known text, published in 1726.

This absence is all the more remarkable because these texts explicitly attempt to establish a link between the emerging speculative Freemasonry and the heritage of the old builders. One might therefore expect the trowel, a common working tool on any masonry site, to be naturally included among the primitive symbolic instruments. Yet this is not the case.

The English Masonic exposures of the early eighteenth century confirm this observation. In Masonry Dissected by Samuel Pritchard, published in 1730, no symbolic role is attributed to the trowel. Likewise, the exposure Three Distinct Knocks, published in 1760 and describing in detail the practices of a lodge belonging to the tradition known as the Ancients, makes no mention of it. The working tools referred to are always those associated with measurement, rectitude, and the proper adjustment of stones.

The only document that mentions the trowel is The Grand Mystery Laid Open, published in 1726, which we noted earlier. This text states that Freemasons use two principal working tools: the hammer to separate and the trowel to unite. Yet this reference remains isolated and appears in a document often regarded as a parody or a fanciful exposure. It does not seem to reflect the dominant practices of Freemasonry at the time.

A similar situation can be observed on the European continent. In France, as in the German-speaking world, the earliest known rituals and exposures of the early eighteenth century likewise ignore the trowel. Masonic documents from before the middle of the century assign to it neither ritual function nor particular symbolic meaning.

Thus, at the very moment when Freemasonry was structuring itself and gradually defining its symbolic vocabulary, the trowel remained almost entirely absent. This observation raises an essential historical question: if the trowel in Freemasonry was not part of the original symbolic core, how can we explain its gradual appearance in certain eighteenth-century rituals?

2. The Appearance of the Trowel in Eighteenth-Century French Exposures

The first clear appearance of the trowel in a Masonic text is found in a particularly unusual French exposure: Le Parfait Maçon, published in 1744. This work claims to reveal the secrets of the Entered Apprentices, Fellowcrafts, Masters, and Scottish Masons, yet it presents a ritual very different from those known elsewhere. In this exposure, the Worshipful Master wears on his collar a Square and a Trowel. After the oath of a newly received Entered Apprentice, he takes a trowel, pretends to mix mortar in a trough, and then symbolically passes it across the lips of the candidate in order to seal his word. This ritual scene, unusual in the Craft degrees, gives the trowel a very particular function: it becomes the tool that guarantees silence and secrecy.

The following year another exposure appeared, Le Sceau Rompu, which this time presents a ritual much more consistent with the Masonic usages of the period. The trowel is mentioned in its general description of Masonic symbols, but in a different context. It appears associated with the sword, a combination that clearly refers to the degree of Knight of the East, which emerged in the 1740s. In this degree, the sword and the trowel symbolise the attitude of the builders of Jerusalem who, according to the biblical account in the Book of Nehemiah, worked on the reconstruction of the walls while remaining ready to defend themselves.

Nehemiah inspecting the walls of Jerusalem. Engraving by Gustave Doré, 19th century.

Around the same period, the Luquet manuscript — one of the oldest French Masonic rituals that has come down to us — reinforces this association. The trowel and the sword are presented there as the arms of the Freemasons, in a perspective that directly recalls the ideas expressed in the famous oration of the Chevalier de Ramsay in 1736. Ramsay indeed traced the origins of Freemasonry back to the Crusades and to the Christian knights established in the Holy Land. In this symbolic context, the trowel evokes the act of building, while the sword recalls the chivalric dimension that certain Masonic circles of the eighteenth century sought to emphasize.

These various testimonies show that by the middle of the eighteenth century the trowel begins to appear in certain French Masonic texts, but in a very specific context. It is not yet a universally recognized symbolic tool; it seems rather to be connected with the emergence of the higher degrees and with the chivalric imagination that was then developing within part of European Freemasonry.

3. The Trowel: the Symbol of a Particular Masonic Current?

The various testimonies from the middle of the eighteenth century suggest that the trowel does not belong to the oldest symbolic corpus of Freemasonry. On the contrary, it appears in specific circles and in texts that reflect significant developments in the Masonic culture of the time.

The fact that it first appears in certain French exposures and later in rituals connected with the higher degrees suggests that it did not arise directly from the primitive tradition of the Craft lodges. It seems instead to be linked to the emergence of new symbolic systems that developed during the 1740s and 1750s.

These systems introduced historical, biblical, and chivalric narratives intended to extend the teaching of the three Craft degrees. In this context, the trowel could easily find its place: it evokes both the act of building and the idea of collective work directed toward a symbolic reconstruction.

Yet a question remains. If the trowel does not belong to the symbolic vocabulary of the earliest rituals, and if its appearance seems connected with particular Masonic circles of the eighteenth century, should this working tool be understood as the expression of a specific Masonic current?

4. The Trowel: a Jacobite Sign of Rallying?

Some historians have proposed a more daring hypothesis to explain the appearance of the trowel in certain Masonic circles of the eighteenth century. According to them, this tool may be connected with a particular political current: that of the Jacobites.

After the Glorious Revolution of 1688, King James II Stuart was overthrown and forced into exile. He found refuge in France, at Saint-Germain-en-Laye, where a significant community of Scottish, Irish, and English exiles gathered around him, remaining loyal to the Stuart dynasty. These circles played a notable role in the spread of Freemasonry on the European continent in the early eighteenth century.

Several scholars, among them the historian Jan Snoek, have suggested that certain unusual rituals may reflect the practices of these Masonic circles connected with Jacobitism. From this perspective, the exposure Le Parfait Maçon, published in 1744 and long regarded as a simple parody, might in fact reflect practices that were genuinely observed in these lodges of exiles.

The symbolism of the degree of Knight of the East also lends itself to a possible political interpretation. The legend of the degree evokes Zerubbabel, a prince of royal lineage who returns from exile to rebuild the Temple of Jerusalem with the authorisation of King Cyrus. In the context of the 1740s, this image of a legitimate prince in exile charged with restoring an ancient order could easily be interpreted as an allusion to the Stuart Pretender and to the hopes of restoring his dynasty, with the support of the King of France.

In this interpretation, the image of the builder working with the trowel in one hand and holding the sword in the other would represent more than the rebuilding of the biblical Temple. It could also symbolise the idea of a political restoration carried out through both action and vigilance. The trowel would therefore not be merely a construction tool: it would become the discreet sign of a project of reconstruction, both symbolic and political.

5. From Political Hypothesis to Masonic Symbol

Whatever degree of plausibility one may grant to this interpretation, it remains difficult to assert with certainty that the trowel was originally a Jacobite symbol. The sources are fragmentary, and the rituals of the eighteenth century often reflect diverse practices that do not always correspond to a perfectly coherent symbolic system.

Ceremonial Masonic trowel, Canada, 1872.

What appears more clearly, however, is that the trowel gradually found its place within the symbolic language of Freemasonry. In certain rituals it becomes the working tool used to conceal the imperfections of the stones, an image already found in the Luquet manuscript. The allegory is transparent: just as mortar fills the irregularities of a wall, Masonic fraternity must learn to cover human imperfections.

Little by little, the trowel thus ceased to be associated with a particular historical context and came to be understood as a more universal moral symbol. It evokes collective work, the unity of the brethren, and the shared effort required for the construction of the symbolic Temple.

Conclusion – The Trowel in Freemasonry: a Late and Enigmatic Symbol

The history of the trowel in Freemasonry presents a curious paradox. Although it was an essential tool in the work of builders, it appears only rarely in the earliest known rituals. Texts from the beginning of the eighteenth century almost entirely ignore it, even though they seek to establish a symbolic link with the heritage of the old building trades.

It is only from the middle of the century onward that the trowel begins to appear in certain Masonic texts, often in very specific contexts: unusual French exposures, the development of the higher degrees, or circles influenced by a chivalric and biblical imagination. In this setting, the hypothesis of a Jacobite influence, connected with the exiled Stuarts and with the Masonic circles close to them, offers a possible line of interpretation, though it cannot be established with certainty.

Whatever the precise circumstances of its appearance, the trowel eventually found its place within Masonic symbolism. At first a discreet and marginal tool, it gradually became the image of collective work: the work that consists in uniting the stones, covering imperfections, and contributing to the construction of a common edifice.

Thus, behind this modest tool lies a remarkable symbolic journey. Perhaps born in particular historical contexts of the eighteenth century, the trowel in Freemasonry gradually became a more universal sign: that of fraternal union and shared labour, through which, stone by stone, the Temple of humanity is built.

By Ion Rajolescu, Editor-in-Chief of Nos Colonnes — serving a Masonic voice that is just, rigorous, and alive

Explore our selection of Lodge working tools, designed to accompany the work in lodge and to perpetuate the symbolic heritage of the builders.

—> Discover the collection of Lodge working tools 

La Truelle - Symbole Maçonnique

EUR 40.00

Buy now

View all

Read the full transcript of the podcast here for those who prefer reading or want more detail.

Podcast – The Trowel in Freemasonry: a Symbolic Tool or a Jacobite Sign?

Among the many symbolic tools commonly associated with Freemasonry, some seem entirely natural. The Square, the Compasses, the Level, or the Plumb Rule appear almost self-evident in Masonic rituals and imagery. Yet there is one tool that raises a rather curious historical question: the trowel.

The trowel is, after all, a fundamental tool in the craft of masonry. No stone construction site can function without it. It is used to handle mortar, to fill irregularities, and to stabilise the stones within the structure. One might therefore expect the trowel to appear very early in Masonic rituals.

Yet it does not.

When we examine the earliest known Masonic texts, written in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, the trowel is almost entirely absent. Scottish and English documents from this period mainly mention tools connected with measurement and rectitude: the Square, the Compasses, the Level, and the Plumb Rule. The trowel is hardly ever mentioned.

Even the major English Masonic exposures of the early eighteenth century ignore it. In Masonry Dissected, published by Samuel Pritchard in seventeen thirty, the trowel plays no symbolic role. The same is true in Three Distinct Knocks, published in seventeen sixty.

A single exception appears in a rather unusual text published in seventeen twenty-six: The Grand Mystery Laid Open. This document claims that Freemasons use two principal tools: the hammer to separate and the trowel to unite. But this reference remains isolated and occurs in a text often regarded as a parody.

It is not until the seventeen forties that the trowel begins to appear in certain French Masonic writings. One of the earliest examples is found in the exposure entitled Le Parfait Maçon, published in seventeen forty-four.

In this ritual the trowel plays a rather unexpected role. After the oath of a newly initiated Apprentice, the Master takes a trowel, pretends to mix mortar in a trough, and then symbolically passes it across the lips of the initiate in order to seal his promise of secrecy. The trowel thus becomes the tool that guarantees silence and discretion.

At roughly the same time, other Masonic texts associate the trowel with a very different symbol: the sword. This association appears notably in the degree of Knight of the East, one of the earliest higher degrees that emerged in eighteenth-century Freemasonry.

In this degree the image is inspired by the biblical account of the rebuilding of Jerusalem after the exile in Babylon. The Book of Nehemiah explains that the builders worked while remaining ready to defend themselves against their enemies. They built with one hand and held a weapon with the other.

In Masonic symbolism, the trowel represents the act of building, while the sword evokes vigilance and defence.

Yet one detail deserves attention: the biblical text itself never mentions a trowel. It simply speaks of men who build and who carry their swords.

Why, then, was this particular tool chosen?

Some historians have proposed a rather bold hypothesis. According to them, the trowel may have been connected with a specific political current of the eighteenth century: the Jacobites.

After the Glorious Revolution of sixteen eighty-eight, King James the Second Stuart was overthrown and forced into exile. He found refuge in France, at Saint-Germain-en-Laye, where an important community of Scottish, Irish, and English exiles gathered around him, remaining loyal to the Stuart dynasty.

These circles probably played a role in the spread of Freemasonry on the European continent in the early eighteenth century. Some researchers have therefore suggested that unusual rituals such as those described in Le Parfait Maçon may reflect the practices of these Masonic circles of exiles.

In this context, the legend of the Knight of the East takes on a particular resonance. The degree recounts the story of Zerubbabel, a prince of royal lineage who returns from exile to rebuild the Temple of Jerusalem with the authorization of King Cyrus.

For contemporaries of the eighteenth century, this image of a legitimate prince returning from exile to restore an ancient order could easily evoke the situation of the Stuarts, living in exile in France and hoping for the restoration of their dynasty with the support of the French crown.

Seen in this light, the image of the builder holding a trowel in one hand and a sword in the other may represent more than the rebuilding of the biblical Temple. It may also symbolize the idea of a political restoration carried out through both action and vigilance.

Of course, this interpretation remains a hypothesis. The available sources are fragmentary, and eighteenth-century rituals often reflect diverse practices rather than a single coherent symbolic system.

What becomes clearer over time, however, is that the trowel gradually found its place within the symbolic language of Freemasonry.

In certain rituals it becomes the tool used to cover the imperfections of the stones. The metaphor is simple and powerful: just as mortar fills the gaps in a wall, fraternal harmony should cover human imperfections.

Little by little, the trowel ceases to be linked to a particular historical context and becomes a more universal symbol. It evokes the unity of the brethren and the collective effort required for the construction of the symbolic Temple.

Thus, behind this modest tool lies a rather remarkable symbolic journey. Almost absent from the earliest rituals, possibly associated with particular circles of the eighteenth century, the trowel eventually became a lasting emblem of Masonic fraternity.

It reminds us that the construction of the Temple depends not only on the precision of the tools or the correctness of the measurements. It also requires that invisible mortar which binds the stones together and allows the whole structure to stand.