The Origins of the Rectified Scottish Rite: The Genesis of a Christian and Spiritualist Masonic Current

The Rectified Scottish Rite holds a singular place in the history of Freemasonry. Born in the 18th century, it combines the spirit of the Enlightenment with the impulse of Christian mysticism, at the very moment when most obediences were turning towards an avowed rationalism. This fruitful tension between reason and faith, between symbolic construction and inner quest, makes the Rectified Scottish Rite a rare bridge between two visions of the Masonic world: that of spiritual reform and that of moral reform.

Unlike the French Rite, which grew out of a desire for simplification, or the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, shaped by the expansion of the AASR high degrees, the Rectified Scottish Rite lays claim to an overall coherence, both doctrinal and initiatic. It is rooted in the intertwined influences of the Freemasonry of the Moderns, of Écossisme (Scottish high-degree Masonry), of Martinesism and of the Templar legend — four sources that Jean-Baptiste Willermoz managed to harmonise into a work at once mystical and structured: the Rectified Scottish Regime.

The outcome of a long process of reform, this Rite was not an isolated invention but the fruit of a gradual rectification — that of a Freemasonry seeking to recover its inner dimension, in the light of the Reform of Lyon (1778) and of the Convent of Wilhelmsbad (1782). More than a system of degrees, it remains a spiritual path, a chivalry of the soul in which the building of the Temple becomes a work of reintegration.

What is the Rectified Scottish Rite, and why does it still fascinate today?

The Rectified Scottish Rite is one of the few Masonic systems to have preserved, down the centuries, so clear a spiritual coherence. Its originality lies in the way it brings together the operative symbolism of traditional Freemasonry and the moral demands of inner Christianity. Where other Rites chose the path of reason, of philosophy or of deism, the Rectified Scottish Rite has remained faithful to the notion of reintegration, that is, the return of man to his divine source, the central theme of the doctrine of Martinès de Pasqually.

This orientation explains why it often puzzles Freemasons of other Rites. Far from any religious dogmatism, it offers not a catechism but a method of spiritual work, a discipline of the soul. Faith is not imposed but interiorised: it is lived in silence, meditation, humility and service. The Rectified Scottish Rite never separates initiation from ethics: every symbol, every word, every gesture is directed towards an inner transformation.

In the context of the 18th century, marked by the coexistence of the rationalist and illuminist currents, this Rite represented a unique attempt at reconciliation. Between the spirit of the Enlightenment and the Christian tradition, it charted a middle way: neither superstitious nor sceptical, but deeply symbolic. That is what still makes it today a model of initiatic coherence: a Freemasonry at once intellectual and mystical, faithful to the ideal of the Beneficent Knight, servant of the Holy City and craftsman of peace.

---

What are the sources of the Rectified Scottish Rite?

The Rectified Scottish Rite was not born of an isolated creation: it is rooted in several spiritual and Masonic traditions which, in the 18th century, nourished the search for a more inward and more ordered Freemasonry. Each of these currents helped to shape an original synthesis, in which symbolic rigour goes hand in hand with a profound moral demand.

The Freemasonry of the Moderns: the common matrix of the Rites

At the beginning stands the Freemasonry that grew out of the Grand Lodge of London, founded in 1717. Spreading across Europe from the 1720s, it offered the threefold structure of the Craft degrees: Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft and Master Mason.

The Rectified Scottish Rite inherits this architecture directly, but gives it a distinctive tone, characteristic of the French genius: a spiritual sobriety, a bareness of form and a measured, almost classical sense of symbol. Where English rituals readily remain more operative, closer to the customs of the trade, the French tradition of the 18th century favours a more interiorised, less demonstrative mode of expression. It is within this framework that the Rectified Regime preserves, in its blue lodges, the reflection of a Freemasonry that is simple and pared down, yet inhabited.

How did Écossisme shape the first High Degrees?

In the 1740s and 1750s, Freemasonry saw the birth of a multitude of High Degrees, grouped under the name of Écossisme (Scottish Masonry). This movement developed mainly in France, Germany and Sweden, carried by Masons fascinated by sacred history, chivalry and the theme of fidelity.

A decisive part of this development came from the Jacobites, supporters of the Stuart dynasty, deposed from the throne of England in 1688 during the “Glorious Revolution”. Loyal to the Catholic King James II Stuart and his descendants, many of them found refuge in France, notably at Saint-Germain-en-Laye, where a veritable court in exile took shape. These Scottish nobles and officers, some of them initiated in French lodges, brought into Freemasonry a symbolism of fidelity to lost kingship and to the destroyed spiritual Temple. They turned political allegories into initiatic symbols: the restoration of the throne became an image of the reintegration of man.

Why did the Templar legend take hold in Freemasonry?

Around 1750 the Templar legend appeared, according to which Freemasons had taken in and protected the Templars persecuted by Philip the Fair, thus ensuring the continuity of their Order.

This legend did not necessarily claim to establish a historical filiation, but rather a spiritual link. It expressed the dream of a regenerated chivalry, in which the building of the material Temple becomes the symbol of man's inner rebuilding. The Rectified Scottish Rite would draw deeply on it: it would make the Temple the mirror of the soul, and the knight the image of the transfigured Mason.

Martinès de Pasqually and the birth of a Christian esotericism

In the 1760s, another current was to have a lasting influence on continental Freemasonry: that of Martinès de Pasqually (1727–1774). Probably of Portuguese or Spanish Jewish origin, from a family of Marranos converted to Catholicism, Martinès was as much a theurgist as a mystic. He founded the Order of Knight-Masons Elect Coëns of the Universe, whose doctrine rested on reintegration: the return of fallen beings to their original state, through knowledge, prayer and the invocation of angelic powers.

Joachim Martinès de Pasqually (1727-1774), theurgist and founder of the Order of Knight-Masons Elect Coëns of the Universe

His teaching, profoundly Christ-centred, influenced two of his leading disciples: Louis-Claude de Saint-Martin, the “Unknown Philosopher”, and Jean-Baptiste Willermoz. Through them, Martinesism entered Freemasonry, giving it a theological language and a spiritual purpose. The Rectified Scottish Rite would integrate this inspiration in a disciplined form, purged of all magic, but nourished by the same aspiration to the reconciliation of man with God.

---

The Strict Templar Observance: how did it all begin?

It is impossible to understand the birth of the Rectified Scottish Rite without mentioning the Strict Templar Observance, from which it sprang. This Masonic system, born in Germany in the middle of the 18th century, sought to give a historical foundation to the Templar legend by claiming to restore the Order of the Temple in Masonic form. Its founder, Karl Gotthelf von Hund (1722-1776), known as the Baron von Hund, was to build an organisation of unprecedented scale, blending mystical fervour, chivalric nobility and political ambition.

The Baron von Hund: between legend and a project of restoration

Born into the minor German landed nobility — the Junkers — Hund was initiated into Freemasonry at the age of nineteen in Frankfurt an der Oder. Between 1742 and 1743 he lived in Paris, frequenting the most prominent lodges and converting to Catholicism. It was there, by his own account, that he was received into a mysterious Templar Chapter, in the presence of Lord Kilmarnock, a peer of the Kingdom of Scotland and loyal to the Stuarts, as well as a veiled figure, referred to as the Eques a Penna Rubra, the Knight of the Red Plume, whom Hund later claimed to be Charles Edward Stuart himself, the Young Pretender to the throne of England.

This reception, if it took place at all, was charged with political symbolism: to re-establish the Order of the Temple was to restore the kingship of the Stuarts, deposed in 1688. The alliance between Templar chivalry and Jacobite loyalty offered Hund an ideal framework: to unite political struggle and spiritual quest. He claimed to have received from “Unknown Superiors” — that is, those same princes in exile — a patent authorising him to found a new Order.

The organisation of a Templar Masonic Order

Back in Germany, Hund set up his lodge on his estate at Unwürde, in Saxony, and joined forces with Wilhelm Marschal von Bieberstein, Provincial Grand Master of Upper Saxony. Together they drew up the Red Book, the veritable charter of the Strict Templar Observance, laying down the rules, the provinces and the hierarchy of the Order. After Marschal's death, Hund proclaimed himself Grand Master of the VIIth Templar Province, claiming to act on a secret mandate from his Unknown Superiors.

Through the power of its legend, the pomp of its ceremonies and the implicit promise of a Templar restoration, the Order enjoyed dazzling success among the German aristocracy. Several princes were received into it. The Craft lodges and the lodges of Saint Andrew were attached to Scottish Directories, but the real, concealed structure remained that of the Prefectures of the Order. The chivalric degrees, reserved for nobles or wealthy bourgeois, conferred considerable social prestige.

A European success on fragile foundations

The Strict Templar Observance spread rapidly: to Switzerland, Strasbourg, France, Denmark and even into the Austrian Empire. It offered an aristocratic vision of Freemasonry, hierarchical and ordered, and very different from the urban, philosophical lodges that came out of the Grand Orient de France.

For many, this Order represented the meeting of the Templar myth and chivalric Christianity: an ideal of honour, fidelity and embodied faith. But for others, it already reflected a subtle shift — from a Freemasonry conceived as a path of moral edification towards a system dominated by prestige, hierarchy and obedience.

This shift in balance, in which form tended to prevail over substance, would soon weaken the edifice: the Strict Templar Observance carried within it the seeds of its own rectification.

---

Why did the Strict Templar Observance collapse?

The system devised by the Baron von Hund had won over the European aristocracy with its brilliance and its promise of a Templar restoration. But behind the magnificence of its ceremonies, the Strict Templar Observance rested on fragile foundations. Its authority depended on an unverifiable narrative and on a hierarchy so narrow that it gradually stifled the inner Masonic life.

As enthusiasm waned, questions multiplied: who really were the “Unknown Superiors”? What legitimacy did Hund have to lead a supposedly Templar Order?

The Convent of Kohlo (1772): the first cracks in the system

The first setback came at the Convent of Kohlo, held in 1772. Delegates from several provinces asked Hund to present the famous patent he claimed to hold from the Unknown Superiors. The document, written in cipher, proved illegible, and Hund refused to offer any interpretation of it. His evasive answers deepened the mistrust.

Duke Ferdinand of Brunswick-Lüneburg (1721-1792), Grand Superior General of the Strict Templar Observance and architect of the Convent of Wilhelmsbad

Yet the Convent did not dare to disown the founder entirely: the structure was kept, while effective power was transferred to Ferdinand of Brunswick-Lüneburg (1721-1782), an enlightened prince, a humanist and a respected Freemason. Hund was relegated to the role of Grand Master of the VIIth Province, under the supervision of the new Grand Superior General.

This compromise already marked a turning point: the Order was depriving itself of its founding myth without finding a spiritual substitute for it.

The Convent of Brunswick (1775): the fall of the Templar myth

Three years later, the Convent of Brunswick confirmed the disintegration of the system. The dignitaries once again demanded that a legible patent be produced and that the Unknown Superiors be clearly named. Cornered, Hund finally admitted that no one could verify his claims.

After his death in 1776, Ferdinand of Brunswick ordered a thorough inquiry: it then emerged that Charles Edward Stuart, who was supposed to have handed over the patent, had never been a Freemason and was not even in Paris on the dates given.

The veil was torn: the Strict Templar Observance, built on an alluring legend, turned out to have no foundation.

A rectification that had become necessary

Doubt spread throughout the system. The Economic Plan drawn up by Hund, meant to provide fixed incomes for the dignitaries, drew fresh criticism: the Order was reproached for its taste for pomp and its excessive financial contributions. The ordinary lodges, excluded from decisions, gradually turned away from a structure that had become sterile.

Yet some Brethren sensed that, beyond the fallen legend, a deeper content could be saved. It was in this context that the reform movement led by Jean-Baptiste Willermoz was to be born in France. He saw in the collapse of the Strict Templar Observance not a failure but an opportunity for rectification: to restore Templar Freemasonry to its true spiritual vocation.

---

The Convent of Wilhelmsbad (1782): a decisive turning point

At the instigation of Ferdinand of Brunswick-Lüneburg, a circular sent to the Chapters as early as 1780 raised the decisive questions: does the Order have genuine Superiors? Does it go back to the Templars, and can their Order be restored? Are the rituals adequate? Should the aim of the Order be public or secret? Does the Order possess knowledge that no one else has?

The conclusion was clear: the Strict Templar Observance, weakened by the revelations, had been emptied of spiritual substance; adventurers of the occult — Johnson, Rosa, Gugomos — had tried to take advantage of it. A rectification was becoming necessary.

The French response to the crisis of the Strict Templar Observance

The French delegates arrived at Wilhelmsbad with a reform already accomplished: the Reform of Lyon, adopted at the Convent of the Gauls (1778). In it they proposed an organic overhaul of the whole system:

• a Craft Freemasonry structured in four degrees (Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, Master Mason and Scottish Master of Saint Andrew);
• a chivalric Inner Order, made up of the Novice Squire and the Beneficent Knight of the Holy City;
• secret classes of Professed and Grand Professed, in which the mystical teaching inherited from Martinès de Pasqually was passed on;
• a Masonic Code and a Rule in nine points, laying down the discipline, the morality and the spiritual purpose of the Regime.

At Wilhelmsbad (1782), the core of this reform was ratified: the assembly explicitly abandoned literal Templar filiation and refocused the Order on a chivalry of the spirit. The only notable exception: the secret classes of Professed and Grand Professed were not adopted by the system as a whole, their mystical content seeming too far removed from the Johannism of the North.

After Ferdinand's death (1792), the old structure fell apart. The Rectified Scottish Regime survived and spread above all in France and Switzerland, in the reformed shape that came out of Lyon and was confirmed at Wilhelmsbad.

---

Jean-Baptiste Willermoz and the Reform of Lyon

At the heart of the creation of the Rectified Scottish Rite, one figure stands out: Jean-Baptiste Willermoz (1730-1824). A Lyon bourgeois and silk merchant, he was also one of the most passionate and learned Freemasons of his century. His temperament, at once methodical and mystical, made him the architect of an initiatic system of rare coherence.

Jean-Baptiste Willermoz, seeker of the Masonic secret

Willermoz entered Freemasonry at nineteen and very early on showed exceptional fervour. In 1760 he took part in founding the Grand Lodge of the Regular Masters of Lyon, a provincial body attached to the Grande Loge de France, which in 1773 became the Grand Orient de France after a national reorganisation.

Jean-Baptiste Willermoz (1730-1824), founder of the Rectified Scottish Regime and author of the Reform of Lyon

From the outset, Willermoz sought to understand the deeper meaning of initiation. Convinced that a “true secret” must lie hidden behind the ritual forms, he set about collecting the oldest rituals, which he compared and annotated with exceptional rigour. His approach, at once intellectual and devotional, made him both a historian and a mystic of Freemasonry.

Martinès de Pasqually and the influence of the Élus Coëns on the Rectified Scottish Rite

In 1767, Willermoz was received into the Order of Knight-Masons Elect Coëns of the Universe, founded by Martinès de Pasqually, probably from a family of Portuguese or Spanish Marranos. This singular master taught the reintegration of beings: every fallen creature must, through virtue and prayer, recover its original state in the presence of the Divine.

The encounter overwhelmed Willermoz: it changed the way he saw Freemasonry, which he now perceived as a path of spiritual regeneration. After Martinès's death in 1774, he became the discreet guardian of his teaching, seeking to pass it on within a viable Masonic framework.

The integration of the German system of the Strict Templar Observance

In the early 1770s, Brethren from Strasbourg affiliated to the Strict Templar Observance extolled to Willermoz the grandeur of this German Templar system. Curious about its hierarchical structure, he requested the affiliation of his Lyon lodges.

In 1773, Baron Weiler, delegate of the Vth Province (Burgundy), based in Strasbourg, travelled to Lyon to install the IInd Province of the Order, known as Auvergne. Willermoz and some twenty Brethren were received as Knights, then as Professed Knights. He nevertheless obtained two essential guarantees:

• the blue lodges would remain under the jurisdiction of the Grand Orient de France;
• his lodges would keep the French degrees of Knight of the East and Knight Rose-Croix.
  

From that time on, he measured the gap between the brilliant form of the system and its doctrinal emptiness. The rituals seemed superficial to him, the chivalric ceremonies devoid of spiritual depth

The Convent of the Gauls (1778) and the Reform of Lyon

Aware of the need for a refoundation, Willermoz almost immediately undertook to rewrite the rituals of the Strict Templar Observance, breathing into them an inner meaning inspired by Martinès de Pasqually. This work resulted in a synthesis: Templar discipline now served as the framework for a Christian spiritual chivalry.

In 1778, the Convent of the Gauls brought together in Lyon the three French provinces of the Order. There the delegates adopted the reform proposed by Willermoz: to refocus the Order on virtue, reintegration and Beneficence. The Templar references were symbolically retained, but stripped of any historical pretension.

The system officially took the name of Rectified Scottish Regime, thereby designating a corrected Freemasonry, set right in its moral and spiritual aim.

---

Conclusion – The spiritual and doctrinal legacy of the Rectified Scottish Regime

By bringing Templar Freemasonry back to its Christian and moral dimension, Willermoz turned a legend into a doctrine. His reform destroyed nothing: it rectified. This essential word denotes both a moral straightening and an initiatic purification.

The Reform of Lyon enabled the Rectified Scottish Rite to become a path of reintegration, uniting Masonic symbolism, chivalry and Christian theosophy.

As Willermoz wrote to his correspondents: “The Temple is not to be rebuilt with stones, but with righteous men.”

By Ion Rajolescu, editor-in-chief of Nos Colonnes — in the service of a Masonic voice that is just, rigorous and alive

Continue the quest: discover the Masonic regalia of the Inner Order of the Rectified Scottish Rite.

---

---

Here is the full transcript of the episode, for those who prefer reading or wish to explore the discussion in more depth.

Podcast — The origins of the Rectified Scottish Rite: from the Strict Observance to the Reform of Lyon

The Rectified Scottish Rite holds a singular place in the history of Freemasonry.

Born in the eighteenth century, it unites the spirit of the Enlightenment with the impulse of Christian mysticism, at the very moment when most obediences were turning towards an avowed rationalism.

This fruitful tension between reason and faith, between symbolic construction and inner quest, makes the Rectified Scottish Rite a rare bridge between two visions of the Masonic world: that of spiritual reform, and that of moral reform.

Unlike the French Rite, which grew out of a desire for simplification, or the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, shaped by the expansion of the higher degrees, the Rectified Scottish Rite lays claim to an overall coherence, both doctrinal and initiatic.

It is rooted in the intertwined influences of the Freemasonry of the Moderns, of Écossisme, of Martinesism and of the Templar legend — four sources that Jean-Baptiste Willermoz managed to harmonise into a work at once mystical and structured: the Rectified Scottish Regime.

The outcome of a long process of reform, this Rite is not an isolated invention but the fruit of a gradual rectification — that of a Freemasonry seeking to recover its inner dimension, in the light of the Reform of Lyon, in seventeen seventy-eight, and of the Convent of Wilhelmsbad, in seventeen eighty-two.

More than a system of degrees, it remains a spiritual path, a chivalry of the soul in which the building of the Temple becomes a work of reintegration.

The Rectified Scottish Rite is one of the few Masonic systems to have preserved, down the centuries, so clear a spiritual coherence.

Its originality lies in the way it brings together the operative symbolism of traditional Freemasonry and the moral demands of inner Christianity.

Where other Rites chose the path of reason or of deism, the Rectified Scottish Rite remains faithful to the doctrine of reintegration: the return of man to his divine source, the central theme of Martinès de Pasqually.

This orientation explains why it often puzzles Freemasons of other Rites.

Far from any religious dogmatism, it offers not a catechism but a method of spiritual work, a discipline of the soul.

Faith is not imposed but interiorised; it is lived in silence, meditation, humility and service.

The Rectified Scottish Rite never separates initiation from ethics: every symbol, every word, every gesture points towards inner transformation.

In the Age of Enlightenment, torn between reason and mysticism, this Rite attempted a reconciliation: neither superstitious nor sceptical, but deeply symbolic.

That is what still makes it today a model of balance: a Freemasonry at once intellectual and spiritual, faithful to the ideal of the Beneficent Knight, servant of the Holy City and craftsman of peace.

The Rectified Scottish Rite was not born of a single man.

It is rooted in several traditions: the Freemasonry of the Moderns, Écossisme, Martinesism and the Templar legend.

From the Grand Lodge of London, founded in seventeen seventeen, it inherits the threefold structure of the Craft degrees: Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft and Master Mason.

But it gives that structure a French tone, made of spiritual sobriety and measured elegance.

Where English rituals remain more operative, close to the trade, the French tradition favours an interiorised mode of expression: a simplicity that breathes.

Next comes Écossisme, born in the seventeen-forties, when the so-called “higher” degrees proliferated.

The Jacobites played a major role in it.

Loyal to James II Stuart, the king deposed in sixteen eighty-eight, and taking refuge in France, they brought into Freemasonry a symbolism of fidelity and restoration: the lost throne became an image of man awaiting reintegration.

Around seventeen fifty the Templar legend appeared: Freemasons were said to have protected the Templars persecuted by Philip the Fair.

This legend, more spiritual than historical, expresses the dream of a regenerated chivalry, in which the building of the material Temple becomes the symbol of the rebuilding of the soul.

Finally, in the seventeen-sixties, Martinès de Pasqually founded the Order of Knight-Masons Elect Coëns of the Universe.

Probably from a family of converted Portuguese or Spanish Marranos, he taught reintegration: the return of fallen beings to their original state, through prayer and knowledge.

His doctrine, passed on to Louis-Claude de Saint-Martin and to Willermoz, would give the Rectified Scottish Rite its theological breath and its inner purpose.

It is impossible to understand the birth of the Rite without mentioning the Strict Templar Observance, born in Germany in the middle of the eighteenth century.

The Baron von Hund, Karl Gotthelf von Hund, claimed to restore the Order of the Temple in Masonic form.

Initiated in Frankfurt at nineteen, converted to Catholicism in Paris, he claimed to have been received into a mysterious Templar Chapter, in the presence of Lord Kilmarnock and of a Knight of the Red Plume whom he said was Charles Edward Stuart, the Young Pretender.

Whether real or not, this reception symbolically linked the Templar cause to that of the Stuarts: to re-establish the Temple was to restore the lost kingship.

Hund was said to have received from them a patent to found a new Order.

Back in Germany, he set up his lodge at Unwürde, drew up the Red Book with Marschal von Bieberstein, and proclaimed himself Grand Master of the seventh Templar province.

The Strict Observance quickly won over the German princes, fascinated by its splendour and its promises.

But behind the pomp lay a spiritual void: obedience had replaced the quest.

At the Convent of Kohlo, in seventeen seventy-two, the doubts broke out into the open.

Hund was required to produce his patent: the text was illegible, and his explanations awkward.

Ferdinand of Brunswick took over the leadership of the Order; Hund was sidelined.

The myth was beginning to crack.

Three years later, at the Convent of Brunswick, the deception was confirmed.

Charles Edward Stuart, who was supposed to have signed the patent, had never been a Freemason and was not even in Paris at that date.

The edifice collapsed: the Strict Templar Observance no longer had any foundation.

Yet out of this failure a new light was to be born.

Some, Willermoz among them, sensed that a spiritual substance could be saved: the time had come to rectify.

At the instigation of Ferdinand of Brunswick, the Convent of Wilhelmsbad, in seventeen eighty-two, sought to refound the system.

The French arrived with the Reform of Lyon already accomplished.

It proposed a Freemasonry in four Craft degrees, a chivalric Inner Order — Novice Squire and Beneficent Knight of the Holy City —, a secret class of Professed and Grand Professed, a Code and a Rule in nine points.

The assembly adopted the core of it, abandoned literal Templar filiation, and refocused the Order on a chivalry of the spirit.

After Ferdinand's death, in seventeen ninety-two, the German structure dissolved.

But the Rectified Scottish Regime survived — in France, then in Switzerland.

At the heart of this reform stands Jean-Baptiste Willermoz.

Born in seventeen thirty, a silk merchant, he entered Freemasonry at nineteen and never left it.

A seeker of hidden meaning, in seventeen sixty he founded the Grand Lodge of the Regular Masters of Lyon, attached to the Grande Loge de France, which would become the Grand Orient de France thirteen years later.

Methodical and mystical, he collected rituals, compared them and annotated them, convinced that a true secret lay hidden within them.

In seventeen sixty-seven, he was received into the Order of Knight-Masons Elect Coëns of the Universe.

His encounter with Martinès de Pasqually overturned his vision: Freemasonry became for him a path of spiritual regeneration.

After the master's death, he would preserve his teaching, which he sought to pass on within a stable Masonic framework.

Won over by the German Strict Observance, he affiliated his Lyon lodges to it in seventeen seventy-three.

Baron Weiler, delegate of the fifth province, based in Strasbourg, installed the second province, known as Auvergne, in Lyon.

Willermoz obtained two guarantees: that his blue lodges would remain under the jurisdiction of the Grand Orient de France, and that they would keep the French degrees of Knight of the East and Knight Rose-Croix.

Very quickly, he perceived the doctrinal emptiness of the German system.

In seventeen seventy-eight, he brought together the three French provinces in Lyon at the Convent of the Gauls.

The delegates adopted his reform: to refocus Freemasonry on virtue, reintegration and beneficence.

The Templar references were retained, but symbolically.

Thus was born the Rectified Scottish Regime: a corrected Freemasonry, set right in its moral and spiritual aim.

Willermoz destroyed nothing: he rectified.

This essential word expresses both initiatic purification and inner straightening.

The Reform of Lyon made the Rite a path of reintegration, uniting Masonic symbolism, chivalry and Christian theosophy.

As Willermoz wrote to his correspondents,

the Temple is not to be rebuilt with stones, but with righteous men.