Light in Freemasonry: from the Lights of the Lodge to the Reception of Light

Light in Freemasonry occupies a central place, at once obvious and yet often misunderstood. Omnipresent in rituals, regalia and symbolic language, it seems self-evident, to the point that one no longer questions its origin or the diversity of its forms. Are we speaking of the Lights of the Lodge, multiple and structuring, or of the Light received at initiation? Do these two realities overlap, or do they belong to distinct histories and functions? To understand what light in Freemasonry truly encompasses, it is necessary to return to earlier usages, to follow their evolution in the eighteenth century, and to distinguish what belongs to an inherited operative symbolism from what participates in a later initiatory construction. It is this progressive clarification of light in Freemasonry that this article sets out to pursue.

The Lights in early speculative freemasonry

The earliest attested forms of the Lights in Freemasonry appear in English and Scottish speculative freemasonry prior to the foundation of the Grand Lodge of London in 1717. The sources available to us — symbolic catechisms, ritual manuscripts and indirect testimonies — are relatively late, dating from the end of the seventeenth century or the very beginning of the eighteenth, but they most likely reflect practices already well established during the seventeenth century. At this stage, light in Freemasonry is neither unified nor fixed: it appears in diverse forms, still flexible, yet already structuring.

The primary reference is of a cosmic and natural order. Light is conceived above all as solar light. The texts evoke the Sun rising in the east, reaching its zenith in the south, and setting in the west. This solar course provides the Lodge with its symbolic orientation and grounds an initial understanding of the Lights in Freemasonry as a principle of order, measure and rhythm. From this derives the recurrent mention of three windows located in the east, south and west, intended to symbolically illuminate the place of assembly. These three openings are not mere decorative elements: they inscribe the Lodge within a space ordered by natural light.

Very early on, the Three Lights of the Lodge partially merge with these three windows, to the point that early texts sometimes use the two expressions interchangeably. This overlap shows that the Lights in Freemasonry are not yet conceptualised as autonomous symbolic objects, but as functions linked to illumination, visibility and the orientation of work. Light is not yet received; it is simply present, as a principle of order.

In certain early catechisms, these Three Lights are also identified with individuals occupying specific offices within the Lodge. They may be associated, for example, with the Master, the Fellow of the Craft and the Warden. Here again, light in Freemasonry is linked to the exercise of an office, to responsibility, to a position in space and within the order of labour, far more than to an inner or spiritual experience.

This point is essential for what follows. In early speculative freemasonry, the Lights of the Lodge do not refer to a personal revelation or an inner transformation of the candidate. They organise space, time and symbolic hierarchy. They illuminate the Lodge before they illuminate the man. This gap will later allow us to understand why the reception of Light constitutes a major innovation of modern Freemasonry, rather than the simple continuation of an ancient usage.

The Lights in modern Freemasonry

With the development of modern Freemasonry in the eighteenth century, the symbolism of the Lights becomes more precise, fixed and hierarchised. Where early speculative freemasonry employed images that were still flexible and sometimes fluctuating, light in Freemasonry gradually becomes a structured symbolic system, integrated into rituals and regalia, and differentiated according to the Rites. This stabilisation does not eliminate variation, but it introduces a more rigorous terminology and a clearer distribution of symbolic functions.

A distinction is then made, in many rituals, between the Great Lights, the Lesser Lights and the Luminaries. This distinction is not universal, but it is particularly representative of the way light in Freemasonry is conceived in ritual systems that emerged in the eighteenth century. In the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite, for example, the Three Great Lights designate the Square, the Compasses and the Book of the Sacred Law. These objects are not merely moral or spiritual symbols; they are placed at the centre of the ritual arrangement and constitute a permanent reference for the work of the Lodge.

The Lights of the Lodge structure the ritual space and organise the collective work of Freemasons.

The Three Lesser Lights are associated with the Three Pillars of Wisdom, Strength and Beauty. They no longer refer to the natural illumination of the Lodge, but to abstract principles intended to support and order the Masonic Work. Light in Freemasonry here begins to detach itself from the cosmic register and to enter that of symbolic and moral construction.

The Three Luminaries, finally, are generally identified as the Sun, the Moon and the Master of the Lodge, or sometimes the Luminous Delta. This triad maintains an explicit link with natural light, but integrates it into a hierarchised and ritualised reading. The Sun and the Moon are no longer merely celestial bodies; they become symbolic reference points inscribed within an initiatory order. As for the Master of the Lodge, he is not a light by nature, but by function: he embodies a symbolic authority charged with regulation and transmission.

In all cases, the Lights of the Lodge must not be confused with a personal illumination. They designate functions, principles and reference points intended to structure collective work. Light in Freemasonry, at this stage, illuminates the ritual space and symbolic order far more than it transforms the individual inwardly. This distinction is essential for understanding the conceptual rupture that will occur when the reception of Light is integrated into the ceremony of initiation.

The Lights or the Light

The Lights are not yet the Light. This distinction, which may seem obvious to the contemporary Freemason, is in fact the result of a relatively late historical construction. In the early usages of speculative freemasonry, the Lights of the Lodge designate collective reference points, symbolic functions and ritual arrangements. They organise space, order labour and structure a hierarchy, but they do not refer to an inner experience lived by the candidate.

It is with modern Freemasonry, after 1717, that the idea gradually takes hold that initiation consists in receiving the Light. This evolution profoundly modifies the understanding of light in Freemasonry. A new element is then introduced into the ceremony of reception: the blindfold placed over the candidate’s eyes, the removal of which becomes the central moment of the ritual. Light is no longer merely present in the Lodge; it becomes the object of a revelation, inscribed within an initiatory dramaturgy.

It is essential to emphasise that this practice was unknown in the ancient Masonry of the Word of Mason, as practised by Accepted Masons in Scotland in the seventeenth century, as well as in the earliest English speculative freemasonry. Scottish sources are particularly explicit on this point. The Edinburgh Register House MS of 1696, which describes a Scottish Masonic reception of the seventeenth century, mentions neither a blindfold nor a reception of Light. The centre of the ceremony lies in the transmission of the Word of Mason, that is to say the names of the two Pillars of the Temple of Solomon, accompanied by an oath and by gestures intended to make a lasting impression on the recipient.

On the English side, reception rituals from the same period have not come down to us in detailed form, but we do possess a valuable indirect testimony. In his work Natural History of Staffordshire, published in 1686, Robert Plot provides a brief description of the practices of English Freemasons. Although he was not himself a Freemason, his proximity to Elias Ashmole, an important figure in English freemasonry, lends real credibility to his account. It emerges that the essential part of the ceremony consisted in the communication of secret signs and words by which Freemasons recognised one another. One material detail is nevertheless mentioned: the candidate was required to offer gloves to the Masters who received him, as well as to their wives, and to pay for a collation preceding the ceremony. Once again, no allusion is made to a blindfold or to a reception of Light.

All indications therefore suggest that, in the earliest forms of speculative freemasonry, what made a Freemason was not an inner illumination, but the possession of symbolic secrets transmitted ritually. Light in Freemasonry was not yet received as such; it remained implicit, collective and functional. This gap allows us to measure the scope of the innovation that would be constituted, in the eighteenth century, by the explicit introduction of the reception of Light, which would shift the centre of gravity of initiation from shared secret to lived symbolic experience.

The emergence of the theme of the reception of Light

It is difficult to determine precisely the moment at which Masonic reception ceased to be understood primarily as the transmission of symbolic secrets and became a true initiation centred on the reception of Light. This shift did not occur abruptly; it resulted from a gradual evolution of practices and representations over the course of the eighteenth century. Light in Freemasonry then changes status: from a structuring element of the Lodge, it becomes the very stake of the ceremony of reception.

The earliest ritual divulgations belonging to the tradition of the Grand Lodge of London founded in 1717 do not yet bear witness to this transformation. The Wilkinson MS, dated 1727, as well as the famous Masonry Dissected by Samuel Pritchard, published in 1730, both ignore the use of the blindfold and describe no explicit reception of Light. They refer to the Lights of the Lodge, in direct continuity with the ancient symbolic catechisms of speculative freemasonry, but without taking the step towards an initiatory dramaturgy centred on blindness and revelation.

By contrast, the situation is different on the Continent, and particularly in France. As early as 1737, the use of the blindfold during the reception of a Freemason is formally attested by the report of the lieutenant of police Hérault. This document, drawn up in a context of close surveillance of Masonic societies, describes with great precision the course of a reception and explicitly mentions the moment when the blindfold is removed from the candidate’s eyes. The reception of Light appears here as a central element of the ritual, already fully constituted.

The blindfold marks the passage from darkness to light and symbolizes the gradual reception of Light in Freemasonry.

The earliest known Masonic ritual in the French language, the Bern manuscript, dated to the years 1740–1744, confirms this usage. It clearly integrates the blindfold and the reception of Light into the structure of the ceremony. Everything therefore suggests that it was during the 1730s that this ritual innovation became established, probably under the influence of French Freemasonry, before spreading more widely throughout the European Masonic world.

This shift is not insignificant. By introducing the theme of the reception of Light, Freemasonry modifies the symbolic purpose of initiation. It is no longer merely a matter of entering a community holding shared signs and words, but of living an experience marked by the passage from darkness to clarity. Light in Freemasonry then begins to be conceived as a symbolic conquest, inscribed within an initiatory narrative, rather than simply as a collective framework pre-existing the work of the Lodge.

The two faces of Light in the eighteenth century

When the reception of Light gradually becomes established in Masonic rituals of the eighteenth century, its interpretation does not give rise to a single, univocal consensus. Light in Freemasonry then becomes a symbol with two faces, reflecting the very nature of modern Freemasonry, situated at the crossroads of distinct, sometimes competing, intellectual currents.

On the one hand, a rationalist and philosophical reading clearly asserts itself. In the context of the Enlightenment, Masonic Light is understood as a metaphor for Reason, knowledge and intellectual emancipation. It stands in opposition to the darkness of ignorance, superstition and fanaticism. To receive the Light thus means to gain access to an enlightened order of thought, founded on critical examination, tolerance and self-mastery. This interpretation fully belongs to the cultural horizon of Enlightenment Europe, without reducing Freemasonry to a mere philosophical club.

At the same time, another reading develops, more inward and more spiritual. In certain Masonic currents marked by illuminism, Light is not confined to human reason alone. It refers to a higher form of knowledge, of a symbolic or spiritual order, sometimes conceived as participation in a divine principle. From this perspective, light in Freemasonry is not acquired solely through study or the exercise of the intellect; it presupposes a progressive transformation of being, through ritual work and inner discipline.

These two readings do not necessarily exclude one another. They coexist, sometimes within the same Lodges, sometimes according to Rites or individual sensibilities. Their tension constitutes one of the structuring features of eighteenth-century Freemasonry. The reception of Light therefore does not refer to a single meaning, but to a field of interpretations whose richness lies precisely in this controlled plurality.

Conclusion – Light in Freemasonry between inheritance and construction

Light in Freemasonry cannot be reduced to a single definition or a simple origin. The Lights of the Lodge, inherited from the early usages of speculative freemasonry, belong to a collective, spatial and functional order, intended to structure both the work and the ritual space. The reception of Light, introduced later in the eighteenth century, marks a decisive shift: light in Freemasonry then becomes a symbolic experience lived by the candidate, inscribed within an initiatory dramaturgy.

Between these two poles, continuity and rupture intertwine. Modern Freemasonry has superimposed distinct symbolic layers without ever fully merging them. To understand light in Freemasonry therefore requires accepting this historical and symbolic complexity, without seeking to resolve it artificially. It is within this controlled tension that Light retains its initiatory scope.

By Ion Rajolescu, editor-in-chief of Nos Colonnes — dedicated to a Masonic discourse that is just, rigorous, and vibrant.

The candlesticks play a full part in the luminous and symbolic organization of the Lodge — Visit our collection of candlesticks.

Chandelier Maçonnique Vénérable Maître

EUR 38.25

EUR 50.00

Buy now

View all

Read the full transcript of the podcast here for those who prefer reading or want more detail.

Podcast – Light in Freemasonry: from the Lights of the Lodge to the Reception of Light

Light in Freemasonry is so omnipresent that it can appear self-evident. It permeates rituals, structures the space of the Lodge, and shapes Masonic language. Yet this apparent obviousness is misleading. Speaking of Light in the singular or of Lights in the plural does not merely reflect a difference in wording; it points to distinct realities that emerged at different moments in Masonic history.

In the early forms of speculative Freemasonry, prior to seventeen seventeen, the Lights of the Lodge primarily refer to collective landmarks. They organise symbolic space, orient the work, and inscribe the Lodge within an order grounded in natural light, above all solar. The Lodge is illuminated, structured, and ordered. Light is not yet received; it is simply there, as a principle of order. It illuminates the place before it illuminates the individual.

This understanding is reflected in early texts, where the Lights sometimes merge with the windows of the Lodge, placed in the east, south, and west, or with certain offices held by the Lodge’s officers. Light is then linked to a function, a position, a responsibility. It is neither revealed nor inwardly conquered. It belongs to the collective organisation of Masonic work.

A decisive shift occurs in the eighteenth century. With the rise of modern Freemasonry, the idea gradually takes hold that initiation consists in receiving Light. The introduction of the blindfold into the ceremony of reception profoundly alters the meaning of the ritual. Light ceases to be merely a symbolic framework and becomes the very focus of the initiatory passage. The removal of the blindfold marks entry into a new symbolic condition, experienced personally by the initiate.

It is essential to recall that this practice was unknown in the older forms of the Masonry of the Word of Mason, as practised by Accepted Masons in Scotland in the seventeenth century, as well as in the earliest English speculative Freemasonry. Scottish sources are particularly explicit on this point. The Edinburgh manuscript of sixteen ninety-six describes a reception centred on the transmission of the Word of Mason, that is, the names of the two Pillars of the Temple of Solomon, accompanied by an oath and gestures intended to leave a lasting impression on the recipient. There is no mention of a blindfold or of any reception of Light.

On the English side, the indirect testimony of Robert Plot, in his work Natural History of Staffordshire published in sixteen eighty-six, confirms this absence. The ceremony appears there as a transmission of signs and secret words enabling recognition among Freemasons. Once again, Light does not intervene as a personal initiatory experience.

The reception of Light therefore constitutes a major innovation of modern Freemasonry. It does not simply extend earlier practices; it introduces a shift in the centre of gravity of initiation. What makes a Freemason is no longer only the possession of shared secrets, but the symbolic experience of a passage from darkness to clarity.

In the eighteenth century, this new Light lends itself to contrasting interpretations. In a rational and philosophical reading, it embodies Reason, knowledge, and intellectual emancipation characteristic of the Enlightenment. It stands opposed to ignorance and superstition, and situates Freemasonry within a cultural horizon shaped by critical examination and self-mastery.

Alongside this, a more inward and spiritual reading develops within certain Masonic currents. Here, Light is understood as a deeper symbolic form of knowledge, linked to a gradual transformation of the individual through ritual work. These two approaches do not necessarily exclude one another. They coexist, sometimes within the same Lodges, and contribute to the richness and complexity of Masonic symbolism.

To understand Light in Freemasonry is therefore to accept this plurality without attempting to reduce it. Between the Lights of the Lodge and the reception of Light, between ancient heritage and modern construction, Light remains a living symbol. It illuminates both a collective space and an individual path, without ever allowing itself to be confined to a single definition.